I like this photo, too. But I fear we two are the only ones ;-). My boyfriend doesn’t like it at all because he misses the spatial depth.
It’s kind of a trick. There is a row of residential buildings in the typical Parisian style in the foreground (what you don’t see is the river Seine at my feet, since I was standing on a bridge and photographing the other bank). Behind this row of buildings is Notre Dame de Paris, you can see its two towers (69m height) and the roof of the nave.
I liked how everything seems like melting into on another. And I like that this is not the usual Notre Dame postcard photo.
I think the west façade is the mostly known view: http://www.notredamedeparis.fr/spip.php?article383
I feel ashamed of myself for not recognizing this, Martina, but you are right. This is not the typical picture one sees of Notre Dame de Paris. I still like the photo.
Beautiful building, and nicely captured, Martina. I really can’t help but looking at this photo. Can you tell me a little about this building?
I like this photo, too. But I fear we two are the only ones ;-). My boyfriend doesn’t like it at all because he misses the spatial depth.
It’s kind of a trick. There is a row of residential buildings in the typical Parisian style in the foreground (what you don’t see is the river Seine at my feet, since I was standing on a bridge and photographing the other bank). Behind this row of buildings is Notre Dame de Paris, you can see its two towers (69m height) and the roof of the nave.
I liked how everything seems like melting into on another. And I like that this is not the usual Notre Dame postcard photo.
I think the west façade is the mostly known view:
http://www.notredamedeparis.fr/spip.php?article383
I feel ashamed of myself for not recognizing this, Martina, but you are right. This is not the typical picture one sees of Notre Dame de Paris. I still like the photo.
Ah, but this showed my “trick” worked :-) Thank you!